Thursday, May 13, 2021

Denial Toolkit for the centrist Virat Hindu in dharmasankat

 

Are you a wanna be Virat Hindu morally corrupted by mlecha liberalism?

Can you not reconcile the horrific castest, sexist, anti-humanitarian, barbaric practices of Hinduism throughout history with your belief in the supreme greatness of our 10 billion year old religion and culture?

Does it bother you that the most sacred Hindu pooja involves throwing valuable resources in large quantities into fire like an idiot?

No? That you might not have thought of.

If these kinds of questions bother you, you are not able to compartmentalize you rationalism away from religion and culture. Compartmentalizing logic and superstition is a unique feature of the human kind. It allows us to selectively use logic where it absolutely necessary( like nobody is going to claim gravity is a western concept and prove it by jumping off a roof) but suspend all logic and reason when it is not that obvious( like Cronil will cure Corona or Cowdung absorbs radiation) . Usually this biological blunder is enough for the our common ilk. However for the slightly more educated idiots we need to use a different approach.

Now if you do satisfy the criterion specified before, then you are stupid enough to understand reason but smart, egoistic and tribal enough to not let go of our glorious culture. As you can see what prevents you from being a full fledged Virat Hindu is reason. If we are to convince your reason of the the true glory of our Aryan Civilization, then you will become the greatest asset to achieving our goal of Hindu dominance. When you are done with this you would be able to work in ISRO guiding a rocket with one had and doing a Ganapathi pooja with another with no internal conflict whatsoever.

The prerequisite you need to have is the belief that Hinduism is perfect, complete and contains the ultimate knowledge. Once you have this everything else becomes easy. Now lets look at the strategies we can use to purge Hinduism of its bad name and make you Dharmasankat free.

Hinduism is science

Bothered about poojas making no sense? Worried about why your ancestors threw valuables into fire? Now the common Hindu might think they are offerings to gods. But not for you. For you it is a deep scientific process where the vibrations of the mantras align with the magnetic field of the earth creating an energy force field that makes you mind clear. The smoke from the fire when combined with the power of the mantras cleanse your body of all impurities. Western Science is yet to understand the complexities of ritual chanting and the healing power of mostly carbon dioxide smoke. Now if you can include Quantum somewhere there it will be better. It makes anything sound more scientific.

Hinduism conflicting with Science

Hinduism can never conflict with science. If it does, science is wrong or incomplete and they are yet to figure out how to understand the true essence of our grand Vedic knowledge. Cow dung doesn't absorb radiation? They don't have the sensors to detect it. Cow dung doesn't contain gold? Science is yet to find a way to extract gold from cow dung. Remember, Hinduism is always right and western science is arrogant and ignorant.

Caste system in Hinduism

This is an easy one. You should first deny it exists at all. Your second name might give you some trouble and the fact that your family marries within your caste might bother you. But this is not because of caste but because of culture. Your second name is just a cultural identity, being endogamous is because of cultural compatibility. If that doesn't work just ask why Muslims and Christians only marry within their religion. The moment you hear Muslims, all your doubt will vanish in an instant. If you are a native Indian and not a first or second generation NRI try thinking about reservation. This should convince you that even if caste exists its all because of the lower castes.

Say you can't deny the existence of caste at all. What about caste system in the past you might ask. This is where the British comes in. Blame everything on the British or Portuguese. Say they took a caste survey and interpreted jathi as caste, caste as varna and varna as color and color as jathi. Make it confusing enough that your natural denial kicks in and that you can't think any more. You might wonder how the English speaking British that could barely collect tax on time could go and teach illiterate Indian villagers about caste. Or you might wonder how the princely states on which the British had no direct control had caste. Such thought process you should avoid. You are already ready to deny a historical reality. Such trivialities shouldn't bother you.

But what about caste in historical texts? You might wonder. There are two ways to go about this. One is intellectual jugglery. Deny that the caste in the historical texts is the same as jathi. Claim that caste was based on Karma and not birth. No, don't pry too deep into Karma or how it passes on as you reincarnate. There might also be literature that contradicts this claim which you should not look up. Now you might not find one character in all of the Hindu canon whose caste was not determined by lineage. But we have made the contingency plan of making Vyasa and Valmiki Shudra to appease the lower caste and confused Hindus like you just in case. This should fix it as long as you never bother checking their ancestry.

Barbaric cultural practices like Sati, Child marriage, female infanticide, Patriarchy

Blame the Muslims. Our great ancestors allowed pedophilia, child abuse and threw women into fire fearing Muslims will kidnap and rape them. Some even took the extreme step of killing the female baby just to save the poor soul from future humiliation. Look how altruistic our culture is and you dared to doubt it. Don't ask why sathi was only prevalent in one part of India and not other places that had Muslim rule.

Patriarchy was forced upon us by Muslims. We always respected women. Look at the female gods we worship. Muslims taught us to beat wives and do honor killings and what not. But they never taught us widow remarriage. We made sure our women are never tortured into another relationship and they spend their entire life mourning her late husband like they wish.

Do not ask why even Muslims allowed child marriage. Don't even bother thinking why only widows were throw into fire as if Muslims would only kidnap, widows and unmarried women. This kind of thinking will lead to horrible contradictions. We keep our culture alive by our sheer will blocking all rational thought. This is not as hard as you think for most Hindus. Just to make these more convincing our agents have already edited the Wikipedia page last year to blame child marriage on Muslims. This will make things much easier.

Government told court that Gay marriage is not part of Indian culture

You might find this absurd. Hindus are obviously split on this. Culturally, most Hindus don't want gay marriage. But the educated ones don't want Hinduism to be bigoted against gays. How will we reconcile this? Simple The greatest asset of Hinduism is that there is no Hinduism. Unlike the inferior Abhrahamic variety, Hinduism has no central text and if we do have any, nobody reads those anyway. Whatever we say today becomes Hinduism. So today the government told the court that gay marriage doesn't align with our Indian Culture. No, problem. When people finally become accepting of gay marriage we will just say Hinduism always respected gays and had gay marriages. We will even find some story from the puranas and twist it around to make it accepting of gay marriages, We have 33 thousand gods. Just make one gay. Problem solved.

What if I still have dharmasankat?

If thinking still gets in your way, just imagine a Muslim, take a deep breath, slowly inhale that hate in, hold it for 4 seconds, allow that hate to seep into your bones and breath out your humanity slowly. Repeat this 20 times in kukkudasana till you finally achieve peak hate. It has double effect if you play Sadguru's video on masturbation in the background without thinking about a hot person of the opposite sex.

No comments: