Wiki or Britannia

I've always known Wikipedia is not entirely correct. Even I could point out a lot of articles (especially related to India) and the errors in each. Now, Nature has come up with a study showing Wikipedia is 30% shoddier than Encyclopaedia Britannica.They all seem to concentrate on just the final number, no one puts them in correct context - Apart from the 24% of articles which are equally bad or correct, 69% of Britannica articles are better than Wikipedia articles! What can you expect from an encyclopaedia that can't spell encyclopaedia correctly?

Which?	Count	% better
Equal	10	23.81%
Britannica	22	52.38%
Wikipedia	10	23.81%

I've been using wikipedia for marketing my company's products for quite some time now. I am not the only one!

Mozilla feedback!

Why does this happen to me frequently? This is just for today - from 10 am to 4 pm, and only those which I sent. I thought this opensores browser was supposed to be free from such things. :|

Updated on 17 June 2009:
I didn't realize how many people like this song!! Download with "Free Youtube to MP3 Converter"



O Fortuna! - Old Spice ad! (midi)
Complete Carmina Burana Collection

Indian VC

Another Indian on Dilbert. Is he from IIT too?



Vijay means victory, hmm...

Another one

My boss had this bad habit of coming to the office before everyone, and leaving after everyone has left. One day, he told me how nice it was to leave at the regular time, but got bored by 9 pm. Nowadays, he frequently comes late to the office, leaves well before closing time, and frequently 'works from home.' :) That's because he leaves early but comes back to the office late at night to work :o